Difference between revisions of "Oxford ICP Etcher - Process Control Data"

From UCSB Nanofab Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (added entry to oxford 60c cals)
(→‎Dependence on Sample Size: fixed numerical error)
Line 89: Line 89:
 
|1/4 of 50mm wafer
 
|1/4 of 50mm wafer
 
|490
 
|490
|48028-0.46
+
|378
 
|276nm left
 
|276nm left
 
|<small>~30-40% SiO<sub>2</sub> masking (NingC's pattern)</small>
 
|<small>~30-40% SiO<sub>2</sub> masking (NingC's pattern)</small>
 
|[https://wiki.nanotech.ucsb.edu/w/images/c/c5/Oxford_Cal_01_26_22_New002_CS_002.jpg <nowiki>[1]</nowiki>]
 
|[https://wiki.nanotech.ucsb.edu/w/images/c/c5/Oxford_Cal_01_26_22_New002_CS_002.jpg <nowiki>[1]</nowiki>]
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 10:59, 7 April 2022

Data - InP Ridge Etch (Oxford ICP Etcher)

PECVD SiO2 hardmask, patterned on Stepper #2 (AutoStep 200) & Panasonic ICP #1

InP Ridge Etch: 60°C, 3mT, 800W/65W, Cl2=18, H2=15, CH4=10sccm, time=5min00sec (300sec)

Sample Size: 1x1cm, ~30-40% SiO2 masking (NingC's pattern). Silicon carrier, no adhesive.

Date Sample# Etch Rate (nm/min) Etch Selectivity (InP/SiO2) Comments SEM Images
1/26/22 NP_1_26_001 ~400nm 240 nm left ~30-40% SiO2 masking (NingC's pattern) [1] [2]
1/26/22 NP_1_26_003 452 260-280nm left ~30-40% SiO2 masking (NingC's pattern) [1] [2]
3/30/22 NP_60c_004 427 11.17 [1][2]

Dependence on Sample Size

We have found that the size of the InP piece loaded (no adhesive, onto Silicon carrier wafer) affects the etch rate, but does not affect the etch profile - ie. etches are still smooth and vertical, but rate varies with sample area.

InP Ridge Etch: 60°C, 3mT, 800W/65W, Cl2=18, H2=15, CH4=10sccm, time=5min05sec (305sec)

Silicon carrier, no adhesive.

Date Sample# Sample Size (dimensions, mm) Sample Size (area, mm2) Etch Rate (nm/min) Etch Selectivity (InP/SiO2) Comments SEM Images
1/11/22 DJ_InPRidge 4.5 x 2.5 11.25 602 64.6nm left ~50% SiO2 masking (GCA Calibration pattern) [1]
1/12/22 DJ_InPRidge 4.5 x 3 13.5 563 76.4nm left ~50% SiO2 masking (GCA Calibration pattern) [2]
1/12/22 DJ_InP#3 4.5 x 3 13.5 612 71nm left ~50% SiO2 masking (GCA Calibration pattern) [3]
1/26/22 NP_? 10 x 10 100 400-450 ~250nm left ~30-40% SiO2 masking (NingC's pattern)
1/26/22 NP_? 1/4 of 50mm wafer 490 378 276nm left ~30-40% SiO2 masking (NingC's pattern) [1]