Difference between revisions of "Oxford ICP Etcher - Process Control Data"

From UCSB Nanofab Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(updated tables, split into "sample size dpeendence" table)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''InP Ridge Etch''': 60°C, 3mT, 800W/65W, Cl2=18, H2=15, CH4=10sccm, time=5min00sec (300sec)
 
| colspan="6" |'''InP Ridge Etch''': 60°C, 3mT, 800W/65W, Cl2=18, H2=15, CH4=10sccm, time=5min00sec (300sec)
Silicon carrier, no adhesive. Sample Size: 1x1cm, ~30-40% SiO<sub>2</sub> masking (NingC's pattern)
+
Sample Size: 1x1cm, ~30-40% SiO<sub>2</sub> masking (NingC's pattern). Silicon carrier, no adhesive.
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Date
 
|Date
Line 13: Line 13:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|1/26/22
 
|1/26/22
|<small>NiravP</small>
+
|<small>NP_?</small>
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 20: Line 20:
 
|}
 
|}
   
=== Dependence on Sample Size ===
+
===Dependence on Sample Size===
 
We have found that the size of the InP piece loaded (no adhesive, onto Silicon carrier wafer) affects the etch rate, but does not affect the etch profile - ie. etches are still smooth and vertical, but rate varies with sample area.
 
We have found that the size of the InP piece loaded (no adhesive, onto Silicon carrier wafer) affects the etch rate, but does not affect the etch profile - ie. etches are still smooth and vertical, but rate varies with sample area.
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="8" |'''InP Ridge Etch''': 60°C, 3mT, 800W/65W, Cl2=18, H2=15, CH4=10sccm, time=5min05sec (305sec)
 
| colspan="8" |'''InP Ridge Etch''': 60°C, 3mT, 800W/65W, Cl2=18, H2=15, CH4=10sccm, time=5min05sec (305sec)
  +
Silicon carrier, no adhesive.
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Date
 
|Date
Line 40: Line 41:
 
|0.602
 
|0.602
 
|64.6nm left
 
|64.6nm left
  +
|<small>~50% SiO<sub>2</sub> masking (GCA Calibration pattern)</small>
|
 
 
|[https://wiki.nanotech.ucsb.edu/w/images/9/90/2022-01-11_Oxford_InP_Ridge_Wiki_Post_-_Cal01.pdf]
 
|[https://wiki.nanotech.ucsb.edu/w/images/9/90/2022-01-11_Oxford_InP_Ridge_Wiki_Post_-_Cal01.pdf]
 
|-
 
|-
Line 49: Line 50:
 
|0.563
 
|0.563
 
|76.4nm left
 
|76.4nm left
  +
|<small>~50% SiO<sub>2</sub> masking (GCA Calibration pattern)</small>
|
 
 
|[https://wiki.nanotech.ucsb.edu/w/images/d/d1/2022-01-12_Oxford_InP_Ridge_Wiki_Post_-_Cal02.pdf]
 
|[https://wiki.nanotech.ucsb.edu/w/images/d/d1/2022-01-12_Oxford_InP_Ridge_Wiki_Post_-_Cal02.pdf]
 
|-
 
|-
Line 58: Line 59:
 
|0.612
 
|0.612
 
|71nm left
 
|71nm left
  +
|<small>~50% SiO<sub>2</sub> masking (GCA Calibration pattern)</small>
|
 
 
|[https://wiki.nanotech.ucsb.edu/w/images/f/ff/2022-01-12_Oxford_InP_Ridge_Wiki_Post_-_Cal03.pdf]
 
|[https://wiki.nanotech.ucsb.edu/w/images/f/ff/2022-01-12_Oxford_InP_Ridge_Wiki_Post_-_Cal03.pdf]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|1/26/22
 
|1/26/22
|<small>NiravP</small>
+
|<small>NP_?</small>
 
|10 x 10
 
|10 x 10
 
|100
 
|100
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
  +
|<small>~30-40% SiO<sub>2</sub> masking (NingC's pattern)</small>
|
 
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
 
|1/26/22
 
|1/26/22
|<small>NiravP</small>
+
|<small>NP_?</small>
 
|1/4 of 50mm wafer
 
|1/4 of 50mm wafer
 
|490
 
|490
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
  +
|<small>~30-40% SiO<sub>2</sub> masking (NingC's pattern)</small>
|
 
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 17:09, 28 January 2022

Data - InP Ridge Etch (Oxford ICP Etcher)

PECVD SiO2 hardmask, patterned on Stepper #2 (AutoStep 200) & Panasonic ICP #1

InP Ridge Etch: 60°C, 3mT, 800W/65W, Cl2=18, H2=15, CH4=10sccm, time=5min00sec (300sec)

Sample Size: 1x1cm, ~30-40% SiO2 masking (NingC's pattern). Silicon carrier, no adhesive.

Date Sample# Etch Rate (nm/min) Etch Selectivity (InP/SiO2) Comments SEM Images
1/26/22 NP_?

Dependence on Sample Size

We have found that the size of the InP piece loaded (no adhesive, onto Silicon carrier wafer) affects the etch rate, but does not affect the etch profile - ie. etches are still smooth and vertical, but rate varies with sample area.

InP Ridge Etch: 60°C, 3mT, 800W/65W, Cl2=18, H2=15, CH4=10sccm, time=5min05sec (305sec)

Silicon carrier, no adhesive.

Date Sample# Sample Size (dimensions, mm) Sample Size (area, mm2) Etch Rate (nm/min) Etch Selectivity (InP/SiO2) Comments SEM Images
1/11/22 DJ_InPRidge 4.5 x 2.5 11.25 0.602 64.6nm left ~50% SiO2 masking (GCA Calibration pattern) [1]
1/12/22 DJ_InPRidge 4.5 x 3 13.5 0.563 76.4nm left ~50% SiO2 masking (GCA Calibration pattern) [2]
1/12/22 DJ_InP#3 4.5 x 3 13.5 0.612 71nm left ~50% SiO2 masking (GCA Calibration pattern) [3]
1/26/22 NP_? 10 x 10 100 ~30-40% SiO2 masking (NingC's pattern)
1/26/22 NP_? 1/4 of 50mm wafer 490 ~30-40% SiO2 masking (NingC's pattern)